On Farm Training and Demonstration of Covered Smut (Sphacelotheca Sorghi Clint) Management Technologies on Sorghum

Authors

  • Asfaw Azanaw Gondar Agricultural Research Center
  • Misganaw Gelaye Gondar Agricultural Research Center
  • Yohannes Kefale Gondar Agricultural Research Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v10i1.456

Keywords:

sorghum, covered smut, incidence, On Farm Training

Abstract

Sorghum suffers from a lot of pests among which covered smut is the most important. Covered smut induced by the fungus Sporisorium sorghi and it is extremely seed-borne and seedling infection occurs at the time of germination and emergence of seedlings. The incidence of covered kernel smut varies from place to place, but in Ethiopia, it was estimated to be about 50%. This activity initiated to provide practical training on sorghum covered identification, monitoring, and technical skills to experts and farmers and to demonstrate the effect of seed dressing fungicides and traditional packages against sorghum covered smut. The field demonstration was laid out on a single plot with 4 treatments; Cow urine 1:1 (v/v) mixture, Thiram, Apron plus with 3g/kg, and Control untreated as a check. The plot size of the experiment was 10m x 10m with a plant spacing of 15cm and 75cm row spacing. Data on covered smut incidence and grain yield were recorded yield loss and partial budget analysis was made. Training of trainers on sorghum agronomic practices and diseases was given to 79 male and 37 female development agents for four woreda in central Gondar and development agents also gave training for 7925 male and 502 female farmers. There was no infestation of covered smut on fungicide dressed and cultural cow urine-soaked plots on both locations while an incidence of 2.8% at Gondar Zuria and 22.7% at Mirab Belesa. Relative yield advantage of the fungicides and cow urine is calculated over the control untreated check. Yield advantage of 20-26% on apron plus, 13-30% on Thiram, and 16-35% on cow urine were obtained over the untreated control check. Farmers have to use the nearby available cultural (cow urine) practice method and if not one of the available fungicides for control of covered kernel smut on sorghum production and should also be scaled out.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Asfaw Azanaw, Gondar Agricultural Research Center

Plant pathologist, Gondar Agricultural Research Center, Gondar, P. O. Box 1337, ETHIOPIA

Misganaw Gelaye, Gondar Agricultural Research Center

Junior Researcher, Gondar Agricultural Research Center, Gondar, P. O. Box 1337, ETHIOPIA

Yohannes Kefale, Gondar Agricultural Research Center

Junior Researcher, Gondar Agricultural Research Center, Gondar, P. O. Box 1337, ETHIOPIA

References

Adane T, Gautam RD., 2000. Validation of farmers technical knowledge in the utilization of natural products for pest management in Ethiopia and India, Paper presented to International Symposium on Utilization of Natural products in Developing Countries: Trends and Needs (Abstract), Natural Products Institute, University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica, 9-14 July

Akpa AD, SK Manzo, 1991. Chemical seed treatment for the control of loose smut disease of sorghum. Tests Agrochemicals Cultivars.12:56–7

EARO (Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organization). 1998. Annual progress report for 1997/98. EARO, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Gaby S. 1982, Natural crop protection based on local farm resources in the tropics and subtropics. Roth Offset, FR Germany, p. 188.

Girma Tegegne, Fekede Abebe, Temam Hussien, Tewabech Tilahun, Eshetu Belete, Melkamu Ayalew, Girma Demese and Kiros Meles, 2008. Review of Maize, Sorghum and Millet Pathology Research. In: Abraham Tadesse (ed.). 2008. Increasing Crop Production through Improved Plant Protection – Volume I. Plant Protection Society of Ethiopia (PPSE), 19-22 December 2006. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PPSE and EIAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 598 pp.

Gwary, D.M., B.S. Bilya and A.C. Adakole, 2001. Evaluation of pearl millet genotypes for resistance to smut (tolyposporium penicilliarie BERF) in Northeastern Nigeria. J. Arid Agric., 12: 81–4

ICRISAT, 1992. Medium Term Plan. Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).

Kranz JK, Schmutterer H, Koch W.,1977. Disease pests and weeds in Tropical crops. Verleg Paul Parey. Berlin and Hamberg, pp. 174-176.

Marley PS, 2004. Diseases of Sorghum bicolor in West and Central Africa and their Management Approaches. Tropical Agric., 6: 11–9

Marley PS., 1997. Report on Survey for Prevalence of Panicle Anthracnose in Nigeria, P: 8. A technical report submitted to ICRISAT

Mengistu H., 1982. Diseases of sorghum at some locations in Ethiopia. Ethiopian J Agric Sci. 4(1): 45-53.

Mtisi, E., 1996. Evaluation of systemic Seed dressing for the control of covered kernel smut on sorghum in Zimbabwe. In: Leouschner, K. and C.S. Manthe (eds.), Drought -Tolerant Crops for Southern Africa: Proceeding of the SADC/ICRISAT Regional Sorghum Botswana, Pp: 185–8. Patancherus 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops research Institute for the semi-Arid Tropics, Pp 2319-9857

Pande S, R Harikrishnan, MD Alegbejo, LK Mughogho, RI Karunakar, O Ajayi, 1993. Prevalence of sorghum diseases in Nigeria. Int J Pest Manage. 39:297–303

Samuel Tegene, Fuad Abdusalam, and Zeleke Legesse, 2013. Evaluation of Efficacy of different Disease Management Practices against sorghum covered smut (Sphacelotheca sorghi) at Fedis and Babile, Eastern Ethiopia, Journal of Agriculture and Allied Sciences

Sharma OP., 1998. Textbook of fungi. Tata, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited. New Delhi, India, pp. 234-242.

Singh RS. Plant diseases. 7th ed. Oxford & IBH Publishing CO. PVT. LTD, 1998. New Delhi, India.pp. 335-343.

Teklemariam W. A review of research on maize and sorghum disease in Ethiopia, 1985. In: Tsedake Abate (ed.). Proceeding of the First Ethiopian Crop Protection Symposium 4-7 Feb. 1985. IAR, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. pp. 21-34.

Tusa C, Craiciu D, Doncila A, Vonica I, Buhnea Z, Olongiu M., 1981. Possibilities of integrated control of Sorosporiumholci-sorghi on maize. ProblProt Plant. 9:327-340.

Wall GC, Meckenstock DH, 1992. Sorghum diseases in Southern Africa. In: ICRISAT, Sorghum and Millet Diseases: a Second Review. Pp. 67-73

Yao JY, Wang SL, 1984. Single variety cultivation is the main cause for the prevalence of sorghum head smut. Shanxi Agric Sci.9:27-28.

--0--

Published

2020-04-30

How to Cite

Azanaw, A. ., Gelaye, M. ., & Kefale, Y. . (2020). On Farm Training and Demonstration of Covered Smut (Sphacelotheca Sorghi Clint) Management Technologies on Sorghum. Asian Business Review, 10(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v10i1.456