Economic Sanctions: Astute Policy or Just another Barrier to Free Trade?

Authors

  • Charles A. Rarick Purdue University Northwest

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18034/ajtp.v3i2.403

Keywords:

economic sanctions, non-tariff barriers, trade theory

Abstract

When mentioning free trade the topic of economic sanctions is seldom mentioned. However, governments of the developed world, especially the United States, have used economic sanctions as a foreign policy tool to compel other countries to change their behavior. The increasing use of economic sanctions as a form of foreign policy is not without cost, however, and that cost is borne by citizens of sanctioned countries and businesses who find international markets closed to them, either entirely or in part. In addition, consumers pay a price through less choice and higher prices. Economic sanctions are barriers to free trade and interfere with the free flow of goods and services. This case examines the current state of economic sanctions imposed by the United States and explores sanctions imposed on Cuba, Myanmar and Iran; three heavily sanctioned countries which recently have experienced a change in U.S. foreign policy action, yet still suffer from trade restrictions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Charles A. Rarick , Purdue University Northwest

    Professor of International Business, College of Business, Purdue University Northwest, Hammond, IN 46323, USA

References

Anonymous. (2016). Iran sanctions: What is expected next? Aljazeera, January 17.

Anonymous. (2016). Myanmar-China relations: High mountains, distant emperors. The Economist, April 23.

Bemis, J. (1934). Washington’s farewell address.A foreign policy of independence. The American Historical Review, 39(2).

Emont, J. (2015). Can Myanmar’s new government control its military? The New Yorker, November 9.

Friedman, U. (2012). Smart sanctions: A short history. Foreign Policy, April.

https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Programs/Documents/cuba_faqs_new.pdf. Accessed on April 21, 2016.

Labaton, S. (1992).Fischer is indicted over chess match. The New York Times, December 16.

Long, H. (2016). Why U.S. businesses could lose big in Iran. CNN Money, January 11.

Losman, D. (1998). Economic sanctions: An emerging business menace. Business Economics, 33 (2).

Myers, S. (2012). As relations warm with Myanmar, U.S. will ease trade restrictions. The New York Times, May 17.

Rainsford, S. (2012).Cuba oil: Offshore exploration brings hopes and fears. BBC News, February 1.

Rarick, C. (2006). Destroying a country in order to save it: The folly of economic sanctions against Myanmar. Economic Affairs, 26 (2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2006.00632.x

Rarick, C. (2007). Economic sanctions: Failed foreign policy tool and cost to American business. Economic Affairs, 27 (3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2007.00757.x

Rasmussen, S. (2016). How Babak Zanjani went from Iran’s top sanctions buster to dead billionaire walking. Newsweek, March 14.

Sridharan, V. (2016). Aung San Suu Kyi pledges to amend junta-written constitution and reach out to ethnic minorities. International Business Times, April 18.

Suddath, C. (2009). A brief history of U.S.-Cuba relations. Time, April 15.

Warrick, J. (2012). Iran’s economic pain deepens as new nuclear talks begin. The Washington Post, June 16.

www.state.gov. Accessed on March 21, 2016.

www.treasury.gov. Accessed on April 12, 2016.

www.worldbank.org. Accessed on April 13, 2016.

--0--

Downloads

Published

2016-08-31

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Rarick , C. A. . (2016). Economic Sanctions: Astute Policy or Just another Barrier to Free Trade?. American Journal of Trade and Policy, 3(2), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.18034/ajtp.v3i2.403