Digitization in Production: A Timely Opportunity

Authors

  • Harshini Priya Adusumalli IBM

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18034/ei.v4i2.595

Keywords:

Digitization, Innovation, Process Innovation, Industry Revolution

Abstract

Using modern digital technology, the production team aspires to innovate and enhance existing procedures. However, the majority of the time, information about these new technology exists outside of a company's walls. The idea of absorptive capacity, as well as literature on open innovation, are used by the authors to investigate the function of external search in the digitalization of the manufacturing industry. Companies in the manufacturing industry who want to digitize their processes can profit from inbound open process innovation, but the effectiveness of this approach differs depending on which cluster of digital technologies is being used. In general, the findings imply that enterprises should focus on developing strong links with a small number of external knowledge partners rather than maintaining superficial relationships with a large number. An investigation of the relationship between enterprises' external search and their use of digital technology is presented in this paper, which contributes to the expanding body of literature on the digitalization of manufacturing. It contributes to the literature on open process innovation by providing early empirical insights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Harshini Priya Adusumalli, IBM

Software Developer, Department of BigData, IBM, Manyatha Tech Park K Block, Nagwara, Bangalore, India

References

Adner, R. and Levinthal, D. (2001). Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: implications for product and process innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 47(5), 611-628.

Bauernhansl, T. (Ed.) (2014). Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik, Springer, Wiesbaden.

Boyer, K.K. and Lewis, M.W. (2002). Competitive priorities: investigating the need for trade-offs in operations strategy. Production and Operations Management, 11(1), 9-20.

Chesbrough, H. and Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 3-28.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, Boston, Mass.

Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.

Crossan, M.M. and Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191.

Deuse, J., Weisner, K., Hengstebeck, A. and Busch, F. (2015). Gestaltung von Produktionssystemen im Kontext von Industrie 4.0”, in Botthof, A. and Hartmann, E.A. (Eds), Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4.0, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 99-109.

Frishammar, J., Kurkkio, M., Abrahamsson, L. and Lichtenthaler, U. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of firms’ process innovation capability. A literature review and a conceptual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 519-529

Kagermann, H. (2015). Change through digitization – value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. In Albach, H. and Meffert, H. (Eds), Management of Permanent Change, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden, 23-45.

Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation. The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.

Laursen, K. and Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(4), 867-878.

Lichtenthaler, U. and Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for open innovation: complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315-1338

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd ed., OECD Publishing, Paris.

Pasupuleti, M. B. (2015a). Data Science: The Sexiest Job in this Century. International Journal of Reciprocal Symmetry and Physical Sciences, 2, 8–11. Retrieved from https://upright.pub/index.php/ijrsps/article/view/56

Pasupuleti, M. B. (2015b). Problems from the Past, Problems from the Future, and Data Science Solutions. ABC Journal of Advanced Research, 4(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.18034/abcjar.v4i2.614

Pasupuleti, M. B. (2015c). Stimulating Statistics in the Epoch of Data-Driven Innovations and Data Science. Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 4, 251–254. Retrieved from https://upright.pub/index.php/ajase/article/view/55

Reichstein, T. and Salter, A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(4), 653-682.

Robertson, P. L., Casali, G. L. and Jacobson, D. (2012). Managing open incremental process innovation, absorptive Capacity and distributed learning. Research Policy, 41(5), 822-832.

Wagner, S.M. and Bode, C. (2014). Supplier relationship-specific investments and the role of safeguards for supplier innovation sharing. Journal of Operations Management, 32(3), 65-78.

Zahra, S.A. and George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.

--0--

Downloads

Published

2016-12-31

How to Cite

Adusumalli, H. P. (2016). Digitization in Production: A Timely Opportunity. Engineering International, 4(2), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.18034/ei.v4i2.595

Issue

Section

Peer Reviewed Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)